International institutions, hostile movements, demographic changes and digital manipulation have created an environment where Israel’s battlefield victories in the war on terror translate into diplomatic defeats in the war for public opinion.
Palestinian State
Ministers demand annexation of Judea and Samaria, Netanyahu vows “there will be no Palestinian state,” as Washington warns Europe against “fake recognition.”
Various obstacles, chief among them international pressure, has kept E1, a 4.6-square-mile area in the Judean Hills, virtually untouched for decades.
The San Remo resolution delineated the area between the Jordan River and Mediterranean Sea as the Jewish homeland, reconfirmed by later treaties.
Legal experts urge Israel to act decisively and make clear to its allies that attempts to impose “foreign diktats” on the Jewish State comes at a price.
Despite the glaring and perilous flaws in the two-state paradigm, not everything that is not a two-state proposal is a better policy option.
Their society cannot move forward if its leaders encourage that the highest honor isn’t learning, creating or building, but killing or being killed in the service of a political struggle.
While the Jewish state fights for its survival, Europe adds fuel to the fire.
Western leaders defend Israel’s right to self-defense so long as it doesn’t exercise that right, the Israeli leader said.
“Palestine” would be a dictatorial, racist state that flouts basic human rights.