Washington signals it may return to force as Iran stalls nuclear talks, bleeds under blockade pressure, and tries once again to turn “negotiations” into survival time.

A convergence of security crackdowns, economic vulnerability and political uncertainty raises questions about the regime’s long-term stability.

After critical remarks from Berlin, Washington responds with unusual force. The conflict shows how sharply strategic assessments on Iran now differ.

Protesters praise “unity between the Iranian and Israeli peoples.”

A state with public backing does not flood its cities with checkpoints, expand executions and shut down the internet.

Israeli and Argentine leaders, meeting in Jerusalem, sign “Isaac Accords” to promote ties between the Jewish state and Latin America and announce direct flights to Buenos Aires.

Can it now disarm Hezbollah, or will it risk national fragmentation?

Westerners rarely apply the terms “colonialism” and “imperialism” to Arabs or Muslims, though the land they control is far larger than Europe or the United States.

It does not operate solely according to traditional cost-benefit analysis. Concepts such as endurance, resistance, martyrdom and Islamic legitimacy play a central role in decision-making.