all

all

Former Israeli hostage calls out UN hypocrisy and moral collapse

Ilana Gritzewsky stood before the Human Rights Council not as a statistic, but as a survivor — and exposed an institution willing to indict Israel instantly while hesitating to believe Jewish women.

Ilana Gritzewsky speaks during a rally in Tel Aviv following her release from Hamas captivity. Photo by Tomer Neuberg/Flash90
Ilana Gritzewsky speaks during a rally in Tel Aviv following her release from Hamas captivity. Photo by Tomer Neuberg/Flash90

Ilana Gritzewsky stood before the United Nations Human Rights Council on Tuesday not as a footnote to the latest Gaza dossier, but as a survivor with an important story to tell, a story that the world body is doing its best to ignore.

Abducted from Kibbutz Nir Oz on October 7 and held by Hamas for 55 days, Gritzewsky confronted UN Special Rapporteur Reem Alsalem in Geneva after a report that once again placed Israel at the center of accusation while failing to seriously reckon with the Hamas-led massacre that began the war.

Her message was devastatingly simple: Jewish women were raped, abused, humiliated, and terrorized — and the international bodies supposedly tasked with defending women chose silence, evasion, and denial.

See related: UN Women ignores the suffering of Israeli women

The United Nations has spent decades perfecting the language of human rights. It has committees, rapporteurs, resolutions, frameworks, and declarations for every conceivable injustice. But when Israeli women were assaulted by Hamas on October 7, the machinery suddenly slowed. The certainty vanished. The compassion became conditional.

Gritzewsky’s presence made that hypocrisy impossible to hide.

Gritzewsky did not come begging for an audience. After Oct. 7, after the failure of the world to keep its promise of “Never Again,” Israel is done begging. She came demanding to be heard, demanding to know why the suffering of Israeli women requires a higher burden of proof than the suffering of almost anyone else. She was asking why the same international voices that claim to defend women’s dignity become cautious, skeptical, or silent when the perpetrators are Hamas and the victims are Jews.

This is the UN’s anti-Israel bias in its rawest form: Israel is presumed guilty before evidence is weighed, while Hamas is granted ambiguity even after atrocity.

The scandal is not only what Hamas did. The scandal is that so many institutions knew enough to speak clearly and chose not to.

Gritzewsky stood before them as living testimony, as a woman who survived what no woman should have to endure.

The real question is no longer whether the UN has failed Israel. The answer to that is clear. The question is whether it still knows what justice is.

Want more news from Israel?
Click Here to sign up for our FREE daily email updates

About the author

Patrick Callahan

This is an example of author bio/description. Beard fashion axe trust fund, post-ironic listicle scenester. Uniquely mesh maintainable users rather than plug-and-play testing procedures.

Leave a Reply

Login