Must Israel be constrained by moral, strategic and political considerations when confronted by an enemy that deliberately strikes civilians in the most brutal way?
Author - Mitchell Bard
More articles from Mitchell Bard
Instead of flagellating ourselves, let us bask in the glory of our accomplishments.
You cannot educate children for conflict and expect them to grow up committed to peace.
Demographics, not missiles or terrorists, may pose the greatest threat to the Jewish state’s future.
Wendy Sherman and her foreign-policy team decided that nuclear restrictions alone were worth the price of releasing $150 billion and legitimizing the Iranian regime as a threshold nuclear state.
Regarding Iran, at least this administration recognizes that the mullahs bargain in bad faith and weaponize diplomacy.
Israel’s Lebanon quagmire
A familiar dilemma exists: to reoccupy Southern Lebanon, which might push Hezbollah north of the Litani River. But that doesn’t remove the terror group’s long-range capabilities or prevent its rebuilding.
Hamas, Hezbollah, Syria, Iran: As the region veers toward war and opportunities are lost, chaos is starting to run the bases.
Feigning interest in peace with Jerusalem has long been a tactic for extracting concessions from Washington and diverting attention from Riyadh’s extremism.
Israel survived the war, but is now tethered to an unpredictable ally whose support comes with humiliating conditions and whose electorate is steadily losing interest in maintaining the bond.
