all

all

MembersTachles with Aviel – The hammer was wrong, the monument too

This monument glorifying Palestinian terrorists should have been bombed long ago. But not like this – or maybe yes like this, but without cameras.

Knesset member Zvi Sukkot during a session in the Israeli parliament in Jerusalem. His unilateral destruction of a Palestinian monument to terrorists has also sparked fierce criticism in Israel. Photo: Yonatan Sindel/Flash90
Knesset member Zvi Sukkot during a session in the Israeli parliament in Jerusalem. His unilateral destruction of a Palestinian monument to terrorists has also sparked fierce criticism in Israel. Photo: Yonatan Sindel/Flash90

A monument that honors a terrorist and conveys to a new generation that the murder of Israelis represents heroism and “martyrdom” has nothing to do with legitimate memorial culture in my view. But that is precisely why the state should have acted — not a member of the Knesset wielding a sledgehammer. Zvi Sukkot had a point in the matter, but with his unilateral action and the exploitation of military protection, he crossed a line. And yet the subsequent reporting reveals a remarkable imbalance: everywhere we see the Israeli hammer, but it is asked surprisingly rarely what that hammer actually struck.

About the author

Patrick Callahan

This is an example of author bio/description. Beard fashion axe trust fund, post-ironic listicle scenester. Uniquely mesh maintainable users rather than plug-and-play testing procedures.

Leave a Reply

Login